BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Subject: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 11:37:20 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20220924203558.00006391.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
- References: <a98fa24ba5d4e1d55f240eb4eb25f453.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <20220924203558.00006391.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
So can vim, that's not my point. I love the idea of an IDE, its how every other application I use works. Why is it software development is still in the 1970s. > On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:23:11 -0400 > markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > >> I'd like an IDE that can run make, parse the compiler output, find the >> errors, and open the source file at the location of the error? > > GNU Emacs has been able to do this for literally decades. Bonus: > gdb-mode. > > -- > \m/ (--) \m/ > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at lists.blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- References:
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Next by Date: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Next by thread: [Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools
- Index(es):