BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- Subject: [Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:15:09 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20221118172749.723khr5zx6n3qdp4@randomstring.org>
- References: <3cdb535c-a04a-fb96-7038-d0c0204af969@syntheticblue.com> <20221118172749.723khr5zx6n3qdp4@randomstring.org>
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:27:49 -0500 Dan Ritter <dsr at randomstring.org> wrote: > If you are running a server, or if you have a significant budget > restraint, or if backups are hard, paying the extra money for a > longer-design-lifetime drive might be a good idea. Even then it's dependent on the work loads. A media server serving up mostly static content won't need high write life flash storage. In fact, servers like this often are better/cheaper with some kind of tiered storage with mid-grade flash on top of spinning drives. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- References:
- [Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- From: daniel at syntheticblue.com (Daniel M Gessel)
- [Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Reducing wear on SSD drives - worth the effort and, if so, how?
- Index(es):