BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Subject: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 15:58:44 -0400
- In-reply-to: <ab541108-f473-9cbb-616f-0a9b27d0e6fc@borg.org>
- References: <ab541108-f473-9cbb-616f-0a9b27d0e6fc@borg.org>
I'm curious. Are those 5 TB drives 2.5" drives (which would be cutting edge) or 3.5" (which is if anything lagging edge by now)? On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:36?PM Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > I have two portable USB-C 5TB Western Digital portable disks that have > failed, that I will be doing a warranty return on. > > Before I can do the return I need to argue that they are broken, and as > I do encrypted file systems, and on Linux, and not even conventional at > that (one is ZFS, the other brtfs), I can't just say "Look, it can't > read files." So overnight I left this running: > > root at tinpan:/home/kentborg# date ; dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=60M > status=progress > Wed 17 May 2023 02:44:09 PM PDT > 2450528763904 bytes (2.5 TB, 2.2 TiB) copied, 14740 s, 166 MB/s > dd: error reading '/dev/sda': Input/output error > 38950+1 records in > 38950+1 records out > 2450528763904 bytes (2.5 TB, 2.2 TiB) copied, 14743.8 s, 166 MB/s > > With unrecoverable media errors in /var/log/kern.log. > > Now I have started the same on the other disk, expecting the same, some > hours into the future. > > Man, these disks are big. Even at (what to me seems) a crazy fast IO > rate, it takes a long time to traverse the disk. > > > Lessons: > > - Spinning media can have problems. > > - Portable 5TB WD drives are maybe too bleeding edge. > > - Even if it seems to take forever, next time I set up one of these > disks I am going to first dd it full of random data. It will be a test > of the disk, and makes the encrypted disk more secure. > > > Grrr. > > > -kb, the Kent who gets nervous when one of his two ping-pong backup > disks fails, and a few months later another one fails. > > > P.S. At least /dev/urandom, at least on my current machine, is a lot > faster than it used to be. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at lists.blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- References:
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Failing WD Disks
- Index(es):