BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- Subject: [Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 06:14:43 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20230525153508.00002dbb.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
- References: <mailman.74087.1684518294.7345.discuss@lists.blu.org> <87wn146ryk.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAMdng5sbQ+uqug6dDDT-fOVkx_sUZid+NMz326OgFvbwpZQAkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=rPEF4+fg47ScCeKfHEpqN78drXq5_CokGPAjNNTnsLYg@mail.gmail.com> <20230525153508.00002dbb.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 3:36?PM Rich Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 May 2023 14:58:10 -0400 > Bill Bogstad <bogstad at pobox.com> wrote: > > > I think most of that is more of a web site issue though. SO MANY > > sites have autoplaying > > videos, timer based updates, etc. Firefox, at least, lets you > > Yes... but not really. I'd mentioned that browsers are effectively > operating systems unto themselves these days. That's not hyperbole. A > browser tab is much like a Linux container running whatever site that > tab has open. Even if that site is static HTML, the tab needs to render > and display that site's HTML, and it has to run whatever relevant > browser add-ons apply to that tab. I think there are at least three categories to consider: rendering the page, running any scripting language components (which might never stop), and (as you suggest) browser add ons. I'm not sure how that is much different from what modern office suites do. Any particular web page/office document can either have lots of scripting or none. I'm not sure it would be appropriate to blame a word processor for the piggy nature of a document that someone sent me any more than it is to blame a web browser for what a web site sent. I suppose you could blame the browser for having the features that a web site/page can exploit poorly. I don't know if browser add-ons (extensions?) have a good analogy in an office suite, but it could be argued that it is the users fault for installing a bad extension. Bill Bogstad
- References:
- [Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- From: worley at alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
- [Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SanDisk Extreme SSDs keep abruptly failing—firmware fix for only some promised | Ars Technica
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SanDisk Extreme SSDs keep abruptly failing—firmware fix for only some promised | Ars Technica
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Hoggish software was: Linux Kernel Building
- Index(es):