BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- Subject: [Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:36:57 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1686942578059.3174346594.325620001@null.net>
- References: <20230616100554.3f1bfbe3.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <1686942578059.3174346594.325620001@null.net>
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 19:12:22 +0000 Edward <epp at null.net> wrote: > Should the average end-user be concerned about this change to /usr? > The internal HDD/SSD installs are Debian Sid (unstable). originally > installed with a Debian 11 image, then 'upgraded'. No. The process creates symlinks for formerly split bin, sbin and lib so anything relying on hard-coded paths will continue to work. The only gotchas are blocker packages (which need to be uninstalled and then reinstalled) and filesystem locking like WSL1. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- References:
- [Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- From: epp at null.net (Edward)
- [Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Debian 12 vs. WSL 1
- Index(es):