BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- Subject: [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 18:23:25 -0400
- In-reply-to: <01ada0c6-0b70-414a-bf6e-8a0005529203@borg.org>
- References: <4ce2088f-6eef-414d-9c6a-e4ae3aae005f@borg.org> <01ada0c6-0b70-414a-bf6e-8a0005529203@borg.org>
On Sun, 19 May 2024 14:05:32 -0700 Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > I looked back on my notes for things I had installed that included > the letters "zfs" in their names and I removed them and apt quit > complaining. You also should look for any SPL packages. Likely you installed standalone ZFS on Linux at some point instead of using Debian's own packages and that's why the conflict. > File systems should work, before being clever and having cool > features their primary requirement is to /work/. ZFS does work. It works better than any other enterprise class filesystem I've ever worked with including XFS, JFS2 and AdvFS. But that's the thing: it's not a "simple" filesystem. It has hardware requirements that, if not met, will cause problems. One of the most common unmet requirements is that all consumer storage, including SD cards, lies about write commits. That is, they all confirm to the OS that they have committed writes when they haven't actually committed those writes. You *will* lose data if you use ZFS on this kind of storage. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- References:
- [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Debian 11 -> 12
- Index(es):