BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] CrowdStrike
- Subject: [Discuss] CrowdStrike
- From: worley at alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:42:55 -0400
- In-reply-to: <mailman.4336.1721834527.30041.discuss@driftwood.blu.org> (discuss-request@driftwood.blu.org)
markw at mohawksoft.com writes: > (3) Unstaged rollout: amateur hour nonsense. But if you've got 10,000 Windows machines, think of the labor it saves! I'd love to see (but never will) some big corporation's cost/benefit analysis of the Crowdstrike mess -- how much did they save by not staging rollout of security patches, how much did they lose from the disaster. I also wonder how CrowdStrike's automated QA didn't detect this before the realease. I mean "apply patch, 100% BSOD" ought to have been noticed! Dale
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] CrowdStrike
- Next by Date: [Discuss] CrowdStrike
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] CrowdStrike
- Next by thread: [Discuss] CrowdStrike
- Index(es):