BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- Subject: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:00:19 -0400
- In-reply-to: <c06fa6eb-3d2a-49d9-bf98-beacaef96293@borg.org>
- References: <20240722090043.3d5b68ef.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <87wml9gsvs.fsf@fsf.org> <20240725171311.6a5d5694.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <c06fa6eb-3d2a-49d9-bf98-beacaef96293@borg.org>
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:25:34 -0700 Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > It might actually *be* true, were the precondition true, if there > actually *were* there a lot of eyes. But there aren't. Even if there were, they're only going to spot the low-hanging fruit because they either don't know what they are looking for or don't understand what they are looking at. It takes the right sets of eyes, knowledgeable eyes, experienced eyes, examining the code to identify these bugs. Quality, not quantity. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- References:
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- Next by Date: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- Next by thread: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- Index(es):