BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- Subject: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:38:11 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20240730165956.15f0eb41.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
- References: <87r0ba3dmk.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <a8a4ed10-9dbc-4697-ba91-216699b7dd64@borg.org> <20240730165956.15f0eb41.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
On 7/30/24 13:59, Rich Pieri wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:04:31 -0700 > Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > >> But there is no reason proprietary software can't be good, just that >> that one pressure for quality is reduced when sources are kept secret. > I think this doesn't hold up to practical scrutiny. So you don't think there is a "I'd be willing to share it, but it's too ugly, I'd be embarrassed, and besides, what if people started asking me questions?"-effect to push ugly into staying in the closet? Maybe. A lot of things make that sense aren't true in real life. -kb
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- References:
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- From: worley at alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- Next by Date: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- Next by thread: [Discuss] CrowdStrike Fiasco (eBPF)
- Index(es):