BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Moving Your Everyday System to New Hardware
- Subject: [Discuss] Moving Your Everyday System to New Hardware
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 14:01:33 -0400
- In-reply-to: <87mskwr0v1.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
- References: <mailman.1.1724860802.19041.discuss@lists.blu.org> <87mskwr0v1.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Dale R. Worley wrote: > > I'm told ZFS is popular and supports copy-on-write, but it adds another > layer of volume management, so I chose XFS as the path with lowest > learning curve. The point of ZFS is to prevent layer problems by making one entity responsible for most of them; so, if you were already going to use several of: - CoW - RAID - integrity assurance - snapshotting - multiple filesystems sharing a storage pool - automatic spares - compression - deduplication or the other features that ZFS supports, then ZFS makes sense. If you only want one or two of those features, it's less obviously a good choice. -dsr-
- References:
- [Discuss] Moving Your Everyday System to New Hardware
- From: worley at alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
- [Discuss] Moving Your Everyday System to New Hardware
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Moving Your Everyday System to New Hardware
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Moving Your Everyday System to New Hardware
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Moving Your Everyday System to New Hardware
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Moving Your Everyday System to New Hardware
- Index(es):