BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] A Web Server is No Longer a Web Server
- Subject: [Discuss] A Web Server is No Longer a Web Server
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 20:01:27 -0400
- In-reply-to: <0101019a18799e11-5117368e-2620-4f64-8c43-e2fbf265c983-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
- References: <0101019a18799e11-5117368e-2620-4f64-8c43-e2fbf265c983-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 23:06:54 +0000 "kentborg at borg.org" wrote: > > Removes the complexity of managing a web server, which is > > unnecessary to serve static content. > > Wow, static web pages are so beastly simple that they seem to not > need a web server. Took me a couple of re-reads to figure they mean the complexity is what's unnecessary for serving static content. Ambiguous wording, and maybe misstating what Heroku does or has become? Heroku is a cloud-based web app platform. It *used* to be a solid platform for running web apps, CI, etc. Enshittification by Salesforce is driving Heroku customers away. Sounds like the Rust folks are jumping on that bandwagon. Either that, or they realized that writing and maintaining what amounts to custom web server applications running on someone else's container platform in order to serve static content is a dumb idea. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] A Web Server is No Longer a Web Server
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] A Web Server is No Longer a Web Server
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] A Web Server is No Longer a Web Server
- Next by Date: [Discuss] A Web Server is No Longer a Web Server
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] A Web Server is No Longer a Web Server
- Next by thread: [Discuss] A Web Server is No Longer a Web Server
- Index(es):
