BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] LLMs and AI
- Subject: [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 08:47:52 -0500
- In-reply-to: <12f1715a-0f53-4309-ad45-cbb061b49752@borg.org>
- References: <fda1d2596fa1cd8b230723e7773f61a0.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <12f1715a-0f53-4309-ad45-cbb061b49752@borg.org>
> On 1/29/26 12:28 PM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: >> Anyone want to discuss? > > We are in a *very* interesting time. In many ways. > > > These things can't "think", but what they can do anyway can still be > very impressive. Yes, thank you. I am so sick and tired of people saying these things are intelligent. My favorite example is a squirrel with 8g of brain that uses less than a watt can out think an LLM that boils a lake. > > These things are very dangerous; lonely, vulnerable, suggestible people > are being destroyed. Please elaborate. > > These things are turning the economics of the web upside down; web sites > with good content are losing ad revenue, new crappy web pages made by > LLMs are flooding the web. Agreed, AI slop > > These things got better by training on more and more data, but they have > run out of data, worse, coming models are going to be poisoned by > training on their own terrible output. exactly. > > These things will make us intellectually lazy unless we are extremely > careful, latter-day Luddites are going to get their revenge as they will > still be able to think. I don't think these LLMs are dangerous in an of themselves, but the fiction of intelligence is dangerous. > > These things are very well suited to programming, particularly in Rust, > because the compiler is to strict about so much. I'm not a fan of rust. > > These things don't scale, the "transformer" innovation that made them > possible does not scale. > > These things got me fired, in fact, I am pretty sure ChatGPT devised how > to decide who to dump when my employer did a massive layoff. Yes, that is a problem. > > There things are turning the labor market upside down, junior level > positions are are being eliminated, the pipeline for creating senior > positions is broken. This is true. I'm kind of selfishly glad that I am at the end of my career, I'm not sure it has a future. > > And, there will be a crash, the hype is not justified. There is no way > it could be. Certainly innovation will take a huge hit. > > > -kb, the Kent who has learned a lot about these things, and is full of > opinions, more everyday. > >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- References:
- [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- Next by Date: [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- Next by thread: [Discuss] LLMs and AI
- Index(es):
