BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Subject: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:13:47 -0400
- In-reply-to: <mhAY9OfKywiwe5p9jbuWP4ZxR5fGgd7_uUqrqbjEws0md5d1BH7updt-DQ7IxVGAWZtMxIQEMFd_TyLwwGLDReULVRqU4GGGU_jnvKXUZOM=@cryptnet.net>
- References: <3ba75ddf-6d93-40c7-85ca-050531c8a4dd@app.fastmail.com> <121cb616-ba15-460b-8633-68b12007d2c1@borg.org> <20260411125347.7a3b1c48.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <aae1dbf0-dec1-46cb-b09c-82a6d0257b91@borg.org> <20260411191138.5e292aa7.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <cfbaecd3-841d-40d7-b7c1-b46c2200d5b7@borg.org> <20260411214838.56b593e0.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <mhAY9OfKywiwe5p9jbuWP4ZxR5fGgd7_uUqrqbjEws0md5d1BH7updt-DQ7IxVGAWZtMxIQEMFd_TyLwwGLDReULVRqU4GGGU_jnvKXUZOM=@cryptnet.net>
V. Alex Brennen wrote: > A few weeks ago, I tried to figure out about what it would cost to do a > good agent based audit on your average opensource C project on github. the > numbers I seemed to come up with where around a few hundreds dollars per > project (depending on the size and type of auditing and using an older > model with a batching discount). That's certainly tractable for most > opensource maintainers... not really a huge amount of money. > The average open source project makes zero bucks a month. The average highly popular, used-everywhere open source project makes about $8 a month*. The tail is long. -dsr- * I made this up, but that should be acceptable to everyone who uses LLMs without rigorously checking every result.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: vab at cryptnet.net (V. Alex Brennen)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- References:
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: rrose at pobox.com (Randall Rose)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: vab at cryptnet.net (V. Alex Brennen)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Index(es):
