BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Subject: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:16:52 -0400
- In-reply-to: <3ba75ddf-6d93-40c7-85ca-050531c8a4dd@app.fastmail.com>
- References: <3ba75ddf-6d93-40c7-85ca-050531c8a4dd@app.fastmail.com>
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/04/mythos-and-cybersecurity.html Good reading on why the AI generated attack apocalypse is a little truth and a lot of hype. Particularly relevant to recent discussion: "This matters. A model that autonomously finds and exploits hundreds of vulnerabilities with inhuman precision is a game changer, but a model that generates thousands of false alarms and non-working attacks still needs skilled and knowledgeable humans." J. Random Scriptkiddie isn't a skilled or knowledgeable human. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- References:
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: rrose at pobox.com (Randall Rose)
- [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] printer question
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Boston Linux VIRTUAL Meeting reminder, tomorrow, Wednesday, April 15, 2026 - What is and Isn't Linux
- Index(es):
