BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- Subject: [Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 19:47:32 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAFv2jcYQJ6Oa_sqv=dH3aaOqSmbeqa+=yLPTg1_dJBafNy=nVQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAFv2jcbdrmbusQb8mUksm3=tVCzRR=igz7DxBYVGCDprNzf3sw@mail.gmail.com> <20260506094920.294eef36.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <CAFv2jcYQJ6Oa_sqv=dH3aaOqSmbeqa+=yLPTg1_dJBafNy=nVQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 6 May 2026 11:50:13 -0400 John Abreau <abreauj at gmail.com> wrote: > It's an interesting hypothesis, isn't it? Well, I've attached a > markdown file that purports to demonstrate the claim. What, that user interaction can contaminate or corrupt chatbots? We knew that. They're designed to be contaminated. That's how each instance becomes a uniquely personal "companion" for its user, driving engagement by enticing and entrapping users in ever-deepening spirals of emotional or intellectual dependence. -- \m/ (--) \m/
- References:
- [Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (abreauj at gmail.com)
- [Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- Next by Date: [Discuss] The Domesticated AI
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- Next by thread: [Discuss] The Domesticated AI: A Manifesto for Digital Immunity
- Index(es):
