BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- Subject: [Discuss] Is open source more secure at the current level of AI?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 18:11:17 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20260417171652.3906b392.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
- References: <3ba75ddf-6d93-40c7-85ca-050531c8a4dd@app.fastmail.com> <20260417171652.3906b392.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com>
And another from a different angle... https://linux.slashdot.org/story/26/05/18/0238214/linus-torvalds-ai-detected-bug-reports-make-kernel-security-list-almost-entirely-unmanageable?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed ... that of dozens, hundreds, if not thousands of people reporting the same bugs discovered by the same tools, ofttimes bugs that have already been addressed. On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:16:52 -0400 Rich Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote: > https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/04/mythos-and-cybersecurity.html > > Good reading on why the AI generated attack apocalypse is a little > truth and a lot of hype. Particularly relevant to recent discussion: -- \m/ (--) \m/
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] RISC-V video?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Boston Linux VIRTUAL Meeting reminder, tomorrow, Wednesday, May 29, 2026 The Role of Code-Breaking in World War II
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] RISC-V video?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Boston Linux VIRTUAL Meeting reminder, tomorrow, Wednesday, May 29, 2026 The Role of Code-Breaking in World War II
- Index(es):
