BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] PwnEscape
- Subject: [Discuss] PwnEscape
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:25:02 -0700
- In-reply-to: <a6156025d58a965a539f8dfa1a70ab97.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
- References: <ee12f1d7-6223-4c38-845c-1036f85ddad6@borg.org> <a6156025d58a965a539f8dfa1a70ab97.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
On 10/19/26 7:13 AM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > I have heard that some people go as far as store system utilities in > encrypted volumes and only mount them with a password. I like that, make "living off the land" harder by locking up useful stuff. Too extreme for me, but in a some circumstances it could make sense. > Its an endless game of whack-a-mole. Sigh. Well, vigilantly whacking all those moles actually does work pretty well. And it helps that the Linux kernel folk take security very seriously. Compare to the constant vulnerabilities in established and oddly well respected products like Fortinet, where they clearly don't care. I suppose because good marketing works, too. > (By the way, Google bases its glinux on debian.) I didn't know that. Makes sense. And if they are pushing internal fixes they like upstream, it helps others. -kb
- References:
- [Discuss] PwnEscape
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] PwnEscape
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] PwnEscape
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Are any BLU members also HAM operators?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] PwnEscape
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Boston Linux VIRTUAL Meeting, Reminder, tomorrow, Wednesday, October 21, 2026 - Managing LLM Drift with Forensic Logging
- Index(es):
