choosing base addresses on NICs

[pfarrar at learningco.com]

     Thanks, that sounds straight forward.
     
     Any insight on 'full duplex' ?   Enable it or disable it?


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: choosing base addresses on NICs
Author:  "Feldman; Gerry" <Gerry.Feldman at compaq.com> at InterNet
Date:    12/28/99 11:45 AM


That is generally true. You must chose both the base address and the IRQ, 
and you must avoid conflicts with other devices. 
     
Jerry Feldman
Contractor, eInfrastructure Partner Engineering 
508-467-4315 http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/linux/
     
Compaq Computer Corp.
200 Forest Street MRO1-3/F1
Marlboro, Ma. 01752
     
     
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pfarrar at learningco.com [SMTP:pfarrar at learningco.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 1999 11:25 AM
> To:   'discuss at blu.org'; Feldman, Gerry
> Subject:      Re: choosing base addresses on NICs 
> 
>      So it sounds like I don't need to consider the interupt when choosing 
> 
>      a base address - that they are independent of one another.  Is that 
>      correct?
> 
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with 
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the 
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
-------------- next part --------------
Received: from ns.learningco.com ([198.112.0.7]) by mail.learningco.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 3.12) id 000026E3; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 12:01:50 -0500
Received: by ns.learningco.com; id MAA08715; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 12:03:29 -0500
(EST)
Received: from tarnhelm.blu.org(207.31.228.20) by ns.learningco.com via smap
(V5.0)
	id xma008708; Tue, 28 Dec 99 12:03:18 -0500
Received: (from majordom at localhost)
	by tarnhelm.blu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA13256
	for discuss-outgoing; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:45:40 -0500
Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (zmamail01.zma.compaq.com
[161.114.64.101])
	by tarnhelm.blu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13253
	for <discuss at blu.org>; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:45:38 -0500
Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345)
	id 66D651A5; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:45:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net (exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net
[16.103.129.42])
	by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D5B3ED
	for <discuss at blu.org>; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:45:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: by exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21)
	id <Y5X5WFDZ>; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:45:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CB2C0161F36AD21188E80000F881B56C05248005 at mroexc1.tay.dec.com>
From: "Feldman, Gerry" <Gerry.Feldman at compaq.com>
To: "'discuss at blu.org'" <discuss at Blu.Org>
Subject: RE: choosing base addresses on NICs
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:45:04 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-discuss at blu.org
Precedence: bulk