Doom interface for System Administration?
John Chambers,,,781-647-1813
jc at trillian.mit.edu
Thu Oct 21 11:49:09 EDT 1999
Chuck Young <cyoung at bbnplanet.COM> writes:
http://www.cs.unm.edu/~dlchao/flake/doom/
Tired of listing your processes and killing them by PID?
I just glanced at this from one of our internal mailing lists and got a
laugh out of it. It should be construed as humor, but apparently it
builds too...
There is precedent for this approach. Over 10 years ago, I saw a
version of the game Hack in which you might be spproached by a Mail
Daemon, which handed you a Scroll of Mail. It was, of course, a
newly-arrived email message. In a subsequent release, the daemon
would hang around in case you wanted to give is a Scroll of Reply,
which it would carry off. You could also dismiss the daemon, if you
had no reply, and you could deposit the scroll in a trash bin if you
wished. It was fairly well done. The main limitation was that if you
just wanted to send a message, you had to go hunting for a Mail
Daemon. Typing a "mail" command was a lot faster.
In general, there's no inherent reason for not using this sort of
model for a UI. The only problem is the psychological one: What will
the boss think? But all this does is exclude from consideration what
might actually be a very practical approach, with a bit of testing
and development with real users and admins in the loop.
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
More information about the Discuss
mailing list