Microsoft hits new ethical low point?
John Chambers
jc at trillian.mit.edu
Mon Feb 19 12:11:43 EST 2001
Derek Martin writes:
| I fear the day that Microsoft manages to convince some idiot on Capitol
| Hill that open-source software should be banned.
Well, a lot of people are already afraid to install anything but
Microsoft software, as in the past a lot of people were afraid of
anything that didn't come from IBM. We'll always have idiots like
this, and a lot of them will be in top management.
Within the government, there's a useful argument: Something that the
security guys keep telling us is that you shouldn't install anything
unless you have the source and have studied it. (Or paid an underling
to study it. ;-)
The reason is simple and obvious. If you install binary software, you
have no way of knowing what is hidden inside it. The programmers
could have been paid by someone to install all sorts of trapdoors,
and you'll only learn about it when it's too late.
In the case of Microsoft, they have been caught in the past
delivering software that silently sends a list of the contents of the
disk back to a Microsoft site. They also deliver software that
accepts code from the Net and runs it without the user's permission.
These aren't accidents. If you run a Microsoft OS, you are sharing
all your data with Microsoft.
Is this the sort of software that should be running on government
computers? Even the least knowledgeable security analyst would say
that such things should be banned.
The only defense against such things is to demand full source for all
software installed on government computers. If there's the least
security concern, all code must be studied (and recompiled) before it
is allowed to run.
Any government administrators who don't understand this are simply
incompetent, and should be replaced with people who do understand the
issues better.
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
More information about the Discuss
mailing list