attbi port blockage
Jerry Feldman
gaf at blu.org
Tue Mar 5 15:04:22 EST 2002
WRT: ATT Techs. AT&T and medione techs were zeros from the day I first got my service 6
years ago (when it was Highway1).
The other day I bought a new cable modem to replace my rental one (about time). The tech I
spoke to was unable to provision it properly, so he transferred me to another tech group. he lady I
spoke to was very knowledgable. The problem was that the first tech did not know that he needed
the MAC address from my NIC. (Over the years, I added a NAT firewall which I spoofed to my
10Mbps NIC. Then I upgraded the NIC to 10/100. Since it was behind the NAT firewall, AT&T
didn't care. But, I like to have the MAC address of one of my PCs and the firewall the same, so if I
talk to the techs, I can eliminate the finger pointing and have a simple single Windoz PC
connection. The lady simply reprovisioned my account with the right MAC address and that
corrected the problem.
On 5 Mar 2002 at 13:55, will wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, srl wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone had these problems with ATTBI and had success in
> > resolving them? What's the secret?
>
> I proxy off of my server in texas sometimes when we're having connection
> problems (Waltham). I've noticed that the problems I've hadd with ATTBI
> tend to be temporary and only last a couple of days or so then go away.
>
> I've never had success talking to their tech support. The running joke
> with my friends is that their tech support is neither technical nor
> supportive.
>
> Wish I had better answers for you...
> /will
>
>
> --
> whatever it is, you can find it at http://www.bluesock.org/~willg/
> except Will--you can only see him in real life.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Associate Director
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
More information about the Discuss
mailing list