further random questions from the newly-unemployed
Bill Horne
bill at horne.net
Sun Nov 17 17:21:07 EST 2002
Well, I'll jump back in, briefly.
1. Ordered lists
A. It's a PITA to do ordered and/or bulleted lists in text. In
the first place, the placement of tabs must be calculated
so as to ensure that none of the lines autowraps into the
gutter.
B. You don't know what the recipient's tab stops are set to, nor
their line wrap.
C. Getting your cover letter to stand out shouldn't involve
doing ASCII art.
2. Readability
A. Many of the respondents feel that hiring managers use
non-HTML-capable email programs, and I don't think
that's a productive assumption.
1. The cover letter almost always goes to HR before
the hiring manager, and HR doesn't know that
"plain text" exists.
2. Even when hiring managers spend their time
managing unix projects, motivating unix
people, and writing emails in exmh, they
*STILL* have to interact with the HR department.
B. HTML rendering engines do make allowances for paragraph
leading, margin matching, and justification that just can't
be
done in plain text. I want my cover letter to stand out, but
not be so unusual as to be offputting.
C. Readability is in the eye of the beholder. If someone has
been clicking through dozens of HTML-formatted emails,
and then comes upon mine in plain-text, it will look
drab by comparison.
3. Compatibility
A. Like it or don't, M$ products are the corporate standard -
why else would we submit a r)Bésumé in MS Word format? -
and Outlook Express is the standard mail reader. That
means text gets mangled, and HTML looks better.
B. Whatever one might be used to in the Unix world, one must
get past the HR process to be able to use it. Ergo, HTML.
My 0.02.
Bill Horne
More information about the Discuss
mailing list