ATT Broadband internet info wanted
jkinz at rcn.com
jkinz at rcn.com
Mon Sep 23 15:57:19 EDT 2002
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:11:01PM -0400, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> At some point hitherto, jkinz at rcn.com hath spake thusly:
> > Does anyone have any suggestions about what type of firewall config
> > is the most straight-forward and reliable for setting up multiple
> > PC's to share a cable internet connection ?
>
> If you need easy configuration, I'd suggest you go with a firewall
> appliance. I have no experience with them, so I'll leave it up to
> others to recommend one...
>
> However, configuring a firewall correctly is complicated, and IMO the
> best thing to do, if you can spend the time, is to learn how to do it
> yourself, and run a dedicated machine for that purpose. Doing so will
Hi Derek, thanks. Thats actually fairly close to what I am running now
to share my dial-up access across my local LAN. Its not a firewall, just
a NAT router but it allows nicely fine-grained control over individual
ports, and protocols as well as ranges of ports. I currently don't allow
anything to create a connection from outside which saves me a lot of
headaches, :-). Burns up a lot of log file space on my Redhat server
though. Distinctly an acceptable trade-off to being cracked however.
This software runs on a standalone system as a DOS program booted under
MS-W95 (yeah, I know.. ). But it works. Its very stable.
I'm hoping to hear what other folks are doing using a more linux based
solution that keeps security intact and still allows decent utilization
of the AT&T broadband speed.
I like your idea of learning a firewall system inside and out. I almost
always end doing the most fine grained effort due to my nature.
--
Jeff Kinz, Director, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA. "jkinz at ultranet.com"
"jkinz at rcn.com" copyright 2002. Use is restricted. Any use is an
acceptance of the offer at http://users.rcn.com/jkinz/policy.html.
()B¬_ -o)
//\ eLviintuaxbilse /\\
V_/_ _\_V
More information about the Discuss
mailing list