Another question : tape drive

[Jerry Feldman]

On Thu, 8 May 2003 12:59:59 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Marget <chris at logsoft.com> wrote:

> > any ideal for tape drive?
> 
> my idea is that they're pretty expensive to buy, expensive to feed,
> and painfully slow...
> 
> i don't know if it will work for you, but the price and performance of
> ide disks is hard to beat.  removable ide drive carriers are kinda
> clunky.  i bought one of these instead:
> 
> http://www.wiebetech.com/specsheets/pdf_dup_sdd.html
> 
> now i can do my backups to my imac running os x.
I gave up on tapes years ago. I back up to a hard drive. 
IMHO, removable harddrives are better than fixed hard drives. In the
past:
I've had the tape drive (commercial 9 track) brun a hole trhough a
backup tape. I've had PC tape drives trash my backups. My strategy is
that 2 hard drives are not going to crash simultaneously (which is not a
100% valid assumption). 

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030509/1e069c4f/attachment.sig>