iPermitMail Email Firewall
Jerry Feldman
gaf at blu.org
Sun Sep 21 16:25:31 EDT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:31:39 -0400 (EDT)
"Rich Braun" <richb at pioneer.ci.net> wrote:
> The ipermitmail offender is still on the BLU list. Any BLU submitters
> who aren't yet on ipermitmail's whitelist are still getting those
> annoying challenge-response messages.
>
> Other than blackholing ipermitmail's mx receivers from the BLU server,
> I don't have any ideas on how to stamp this problem out. (Obviously
> whoever's using ipermitmail is not getting BLU postings anymore, so
> he/she remains oblivious to our complaints, or if they are aware, they
> have chosen not to discontinue using ipermitmail for the BLU
> subscription.)
>
> Perhaps BLU should post a policy on the mailing-list page asking that
> new subscribers double-check their email address to make sure it does
> not have challenge-response spam checking software enabled.
>
> I suppose another idea would be to write a script that extracts the
> domain portion of each of the current BLU subscribers and does a 'dig'
> for the MX records. The output could then be grep'ed for
> ipermitmail.com or ilap.com to hopefully find the offending address.
If we can figure out who it is,
- --
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/bgk7+wA+1cUGHqkRAobUAJ9rojGwwZhN4NMOqC2fehxwyFJ9rQCfdEpv
vJMtHXwcZAnDrH61Sp5fXqo=
=6g3B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Discuss
mailing list