BLU lists - mailman queue test

[Jerry Feldman]

On Fri, 28 May 2004 07:15:15 -0400
David Kramer <david at thekramers.net> wrote:

> Theory: What is happening is that there are so many failure attempts
> on the WIND list  (and maybe others) that are waiting their 4 days
> before removal from the queue, that the mail server is being starved
> so it can't get *good* emails out fast enough.
> 
> Maybe we could copy the mail queue somewhere else and wipe it out,
> then slowly (one a minute) inject queue entries back into the live
> directory from the backup.
I do backup mailman nightly. We remove the waiting queue on several
lists. Wind is the only purely moderated list we have. JABR or I remove
the waiting queues for discuss and other lists since the list owners
don't have the time to seal with the SPAM. 

Personally, I don't think that the problem is with mailman, but with
postfix. 

I was suspecting that possibly the MIME stripper might be causing some
problems with some of the lists, but discuss does not use the stripper. 
-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20040528/eacd2750/attachment.sig>