Discuss Digest, Vol 2, Issue 31

[Derek Martin]

On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:52:59PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> I would take exception to the lack of options.  I have Speakeasy
> (which doesn't have such onerous terms)

And also isn't that widely available.  I've known a number of people
who wanted to get Speakeasy DSL, but were unable to.  They are the
only high-speed provider in the area I am aware of which does not have
such a TOS, so I have to agree with Rich that there generally are a
lack of options...

You just happen to be lucky enough to have the only real option
available.

> Quite honestly, I'm a lot more bothered by these "reasonable" limits
> on traffic volume and general no-server (ftp, web) policies than I am
> by blocking of port 25 outbound.  

What's the difference?  You need the port unblocked to run a mail
server...

-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail.  Sorry for the inconvenience.  Thank the spammers.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20041124/5458d101/attachment.sig>