Use of Root
Jerry Feldman
gaf at blu.org
Tue Feb 1 09:39:36 EST 2005
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 08:36, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
> Jerry Feldman writes:
> > Does the business want its programmers to spend
> > time installing and maintaining software?
>
> OTOH, does a business want its programmers twiddling their thumbs
> waiting for the IT staff to maintain and install software?
This is absolutely true. I come from an environment where the engineers
install and maintain their own systems. At Raytheon, in general, engineers
were not given root access to their workstations, and HP-UX was installed
through an ignite server. I do happen to agree with you 100%, but I once
worked in IT so I can try to espouse the IT point of view.
> There could be any number of reasons for this situation: overworked
> IT staff, the IT staff might not know how to install and maintain the
> software, the IT staff might not be familiar with the programmer's
> needs. Etc.
In most cases, they don't want an accountant or manager to take the time to
fool with the system. In a development environment, you've got people who
can maintain their systems effectively. Additionally, corporate wants its
networks protected, so they don't want someone installing some virus-laden
software they downloaded from the net.
The IT people want the systems to be in a known state so they can support
them, or another point of view is that they don't have to support a lot of
different stuff.
> I'm not trying to start a flamewar (and this subject has caused
> flamewars in the past). This is just the other side of the coin.
I agree here. There is no real answer. I take the approach that in general,
privileges are not granted, but that certain groups or individuals should
be given privs.
--
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
More information about the Discuss
mailing list