Wireless SRX technology

[Jack Coats]

IMHO, doing the cable is doable, but not really worth it.
I suggest stringing cat-5 (even replacing cat-3 or worse phone lines with 
cat-5 if you have cross talk) if you can.  Wireless is great, but after 
using 'fixed wireless' (in my desktop, because I am moving I also removed my 
cat-5 from the house, it wasn't a pretty setup) I like the wired install 
much better.  It could be my belkin 54G router.  

Anyway, if you can, cat-5, otherwise wireless is OK, just not great.

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Bob Leigh <bobleigh at twomeeps.com>
To: discuss at blu.org
Sent: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:12:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Wireless SRX technology

> Bill Horne <bill at horne.net> wrote:
> > BTW, there are devices available which will allow use of Cable-TV Coax 
> > for wired Ethernet connections
> 
> and I replied:
> > I'd like to hear more about this.  How expensive are these devices, and
> > how do they compare with the costs of pulling cat5?
> 
> I've seen several replies regarding the cost of pulling cat5 versus going
> wireless -- but what about using existing RG59 in the walls?  How 
> much do the RG59-to-Ethernet adapters cost?  Are they a viable 
> alternative to wireless in situations where cat5 isn't already present?
> 
> -- 
> Bob Leigh	bobleigh at twomeeps.com
>     "All the world seems in tune on a spring afternoon..."
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://olduvai.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
------- End of Original Message -------