(OT) Fwd: My take on E911 and VoIP
Jeff Kinz
jkinz at kinz.org
Fri May 27 08:27:34 EDT 2005
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:44:42AM -0400, Bill Horne wrote:
> With my brother's permission, I'm forwarding to the list his comments
> about my recent post.
>
> From: MFF/RThomas D. Horne <hornetd.ta.mindspring.com>
>
> Now we get into this debate and some of the VOIP providers want to blame
> us for not staffing administrative telephone numbers around the clock
> thus giving them an inexpensive way out of the charges being leveled
> against them. Those of you who are familiar with the technology are
> even more aware than we are of the qualitative difference between 911
> service and any ten digit telephone number but most of the public are
> not aware of those differences. Add to this the fact that the VOIP
> providers are scared to death that they will be required to provide 911
> service at the first exchange rather than at their offices hundreds or
> thousands of miles away and you have us drawing and sharpening our
> public relations knives quite ready to leap down the throat of anyone
> who tries to shift the blame for the recent communications failures onto
> us.
>
> The best defense being a good offense there is a strong temptation
> to condemn VOIP providers as profiteers who are unwilling to bear their
> share of the cost of 911 service regardless of whether that is in fact
> true. We have been working with the ILECs for a long time. We have
> gotten used to them and they to us. The VOIP folks are the new kids on
> the block so we are automatically on our guard for any hint of cost
> shifting in both the financial and public confidence areas.
Sounds Like Mr Horne understands the issues very well as well as their
importance. I hope all of the states have their firefighters as well
represented.
--
Jeff Kinz, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list