Rough upgrade to FC4
David Kramer
david at thekramers.net
Mon Jan 23 00:23:10 EST 2006
Bill Mills-Curran wrote:
> I just upgraded to FC4 from FC3 and I had some troubles that should
> not have happened. My FC3 system was current with updates, and I used
> downloaded ISO's from fedora. The problem was that many of the FC3
> packages were more up to date than the FC4 packages, so the upgrade
> did not install them. This included the kernel. I felt lucky that I
> had a workable system.
>
> Running up2date did not help -- I was still in an FC3 system (kind of).
>
> I manually installed the FC4 kernel and ran up2date again, but it was
> stuck on many packages, because up2date only wanted to freshen
> existing rpm's -- it didn't want to add any new ones to solve
> dependencies.
Red Hat has taught me well. It has been *many* years since I have
upgraded from one release of an OS to another. I have experienced, and
heard of, too many horror stories. Mostly with systems that have had
software installed from other sources, or non-RPM software, but I've
never seen a sufficiently useful server that had only software from it's
maker's repository.
I always back up my data, /etc, /var, /home, and some other directories,
nuke it from orbit, and install the new OS. It just works, I know when
I'm done all the software will be compatible[0], config files will match
the new software, old crufty stuff I forgot about over a year ago won't
continue to fill up my hard drive, and updates will continue to work.
[0] Well, except for that gcc version messiness Red Hat pulled a few
versions ago.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list