file recovery for bad drives
Nicholas Bodley
nbodley at speakeasy.net
Thu Sep 7 02:50:58 EDT 2006
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 21:39:20 -0400, Tom Metro <blu at vl.com> wrote:
> Nicholas Bodley wrote:
>> Some time back, I mistakenly over-wrote a FAT32 archive partition...
>> with an ext3fs.
>
> Given that it is FAT32, you might find your time is better spent by
> buying a commercial recovery tool.
I have considered that; one from Germany looked very promising, and you
could pay various amounts to enable more or less of it.
> There are a lot of them. Many relatively cheap ($50 or less). Some
> freeware. Restorer2000 is an example of a commercial tool I've used.
(http://www.restorer2000.com/)
> PC INSPECTOR is an example of a freeware tool (which I haven't tried).
> (http://www.pcinspector.de/file_recovery/UK/welcome.htm) There's also an
> 'unformat' tool kicking around that might do the trick.
I'll look into thos; thanks much!
> But you'll need to run them from Windows,
Likely to be OK.
> and you'll probably need to leave the files in place on the partition -
> not copied to an image file on some other drive.
Looks like very valuable advice!
> You can always do that in parallel to anything else you try. It's always
> a good idea to backup a drive before attempting any recovery operations
> anyway.
> A command like:
> dd if=/dev/<partition> of=/path/to/image/file
> should do it.
Good! I was thinking I'd need to get the block total correct; seems that
"end of partition" is auto-sensed, which is very reasonable and expected.
I plan to study [man dd], too.
>> ...am curious about whether there's any chance of reconstructing the
>> FAT(s).
> There may be a copy still intact.
If the second copy starts closely after the first, I'm probably out of
luck. Seems that ext3 writes a fair amount at the beginning of its
partition, and it probably over-wrote both FATs.
> But even if the FAT was fully restored, some of your data still might
> have gotten clobbered by the ext3 formatting, which probably writes to
> different areas of the disk than FAT32.
Something like inode clusters, although I'm probably using the wrong term.
That's what I expect. Some files, or parts of them, are lost except to
those with huge amounts of money.
> You'll probably be able to recover many of your files using one of the
> automated tools mentioned above.
That's what I expect.
>
> This article:
> How a Corrupted USB Drive Was Saved by GNU/Linux
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8366
>
> describes one way to do a manual partition recovery.
I scanned that, and don't know nearly enough; such topics as FAT details,
offsets, etc. are yet to be learned. (I can do OK with a hex editor,
though. I speak hex with decent fluency.) Nevertheless, thanks, kindly!
One thing about looking at the munged partition is that it's an empty
ext3fs written over a FAT32 partition with lots of data. To make any sense
of a hex dump, I'd need to learn details of both filesystems. (^_^)
Again, Tom, many thanks! I rarely print anything, but your message has
been folded and tucked safely into my machine. Hard to lose track, that
way. :)
--
Nicholas Bodley /*|*\ Waltham, Mass.
A commentator for Howthingswork at YahooGroups
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list