issue tracking system

[Stephen Adler]

Thanks for the quick replies. The main issue I have to address is bug 
tracking, but could fall out into
issue tracking. The guy who's giving me $orders is a bit unclear and I 
don't think he himself knows.
What's more important is to make sure people can't go in willy-nilly and 
change the status or state
of any of the bugs (or entries). It has to be done through an 
authenticated method. All changes
to the wiki part of trac or what ever system is setup has to be 
controlled and recorded. (Sort of
taking the wiki out of wiki...) This is
the make or break requirement since its for a medical device manufacture 
and we need to ad hear to
FDA standards.

Having the ability to track the code with changes to the repository etc 
as in trac is more of a nice
feature than a requirements. The main requirement is for people in the 
field or within the
company, at any level, report problems with the code, and that reported 
problem needs to
be tracked from inception to resolution in a controlled manner through 
authorized
(username/password) access.

Steve.

Kordova wrote:
> trac is great. i could say more but i dont really know what it is you 
> are looking for precisely.
>
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Stephen Adler wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I need to setup an issue tracking system (bugzilla, trac, whatever..) 
>> for a client. Any comments
>> or suggestions or preferences out there? I sort of feel like I'm 
>> about to marry into an issue tracking
>> system, (like choosing your Linux distro.) and don't want to spend 
>> too much time setting up and
>> playing around with various options. I'm seriously considering trac 
>> at the moment.
>>
>>   http://trac.edgewall.org/
>>
>> Steve.
>>
>>
>> --This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at blu.org
>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> --This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.