wps files
Chadwick
gmrwick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Wed Jun 20 12:12:09 EDT 2007
On 6/20/07, Kristian Hermansen <kristian.hermansen-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 6/20/07, Chadwick <gmrwick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > I always thought wps means word perfect suite document. I had the
> > same problem, and am suprised that OO has not included word perfect
> > even still.
>
> Yeah, with libwps available, someone should have added it to OO by now
> you would think. Well, who's got some free time :-) Get to it...
right!
>
> > OTOH, perhaps you should commend the sender on not using a microsoft
> > office product. . perhaps.
>
> I read that the Works format is even less open than Word. So, maybe
> they should have used Word instead!??! Anyways, Microsoft Works is
> like sooooo 1998 or something... I mean, every PC manufacturer gave
> it away for free back then...
microsoft works is very different from corel word perfect, and last
time I saw works it was just a dumber version of regular office.. At
one time word perfect was offered for Linux . . microsoft has never
offered works or word for LInux.
Anyway, aren't .wps extensions for word perfect?
--
Chadwick
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list