Micro$oft: Winning Against Linux The Smart Way
John Chambers
jc at trillian.mit.edu
Tue Mar 20 15:28:10 EDT 2007
Dan Ritter wrote:
| > Jerry Feldman wrote:
| > Is it just me, or is this complete gibberish:
| > "Emphasize the value of the ecosystem and integrity of the platform"
|
| A quick translation:
|
| ... And it will have a
| GUI. Linux is largely configured by people typing things into
| text files; that requires much more skill than answering a
| simple series of questions. More skill means more money."
The main thing that struck me about that site's sales talk was that
it's a nice illustration of the opposite. It took me a fair amount of
poking at random to get it to perform for me, and even then, I was
never too sure why what I poked gave the response that I got. It
shows a major problem with many GUI tools: The user has to learn
every app from scratch. A lot of time is wasted exploring the GUI to
figure out how to get it to do what you want. Even something that
you've used before can be "new" after a few months away from it,
because nothing carries over from other apps, and you don't remember
what little you learned about a tool the last time you had to use it.
The unix/linux crowd, OTOH, figured out the benefits of a (somewhat)
consistent, text-based config scheme. You only need to learn an
editor to make changes, and any editor will do. A config file can
easily contain commented-out examples of all the possibilities, with
accompanying comments. You can easily jump around in a text file by
scanning for keywords or by marking lines for later reuse, This is
usually much easier than remembering how to navigate a maze of
windows with no coherent organization.
I wonder how the MS sales folks would respond to linux sales people
using this site as a bad example of how the MS GUI approach works?
--
_'
O
<:#/> John Chambers
+ <jc at trillian.mit.edu>
/#\ <jc1742 at gmail.com>
| |
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list