voip vs. your isp
Matthew Gillen
me-5yx05kfkO/aqeI1yJSURBw at public.gmane.org
Mon Jan 26 14:36:03 EST 2009
Jack Coats wrote:
> ... Unless you can get a IP provider that focuses on
> low latency connectivity or you manage your own network end to end, it
> is almost impossible to guarantee any kind of high quality VOIP service.
>
> It doesn't have to be that way. But from experience, most IP providers
> do not give priority to VOIP flagged packets, so even flagging them is a
> waste of time. And if even one of the routers 'accidentally drops' the
> flag, all bets are off.
>
> If industry starts recognizing the priority flags for VOIP or other
> truly time sensitive packets, there are people/companies that will turn
> it on for all their packets, making it a moot point again.
The article I mentioned wasn't even complaining about not giving VoIP high
priority. Apparently the mechanism Comshaft uses to implement their
congestion-control unduly hurts VoIP, since it starts adding delays to packets
from "heavy users" (ie makes them lower-priority than "normal" packets).
The problem is that /their/ voice service of course isn't subject this
de-prioritorization. So you're sort of railroaded into their service.
Matt
More information about the Discuss
mailing list