OS X vs. desktop Linux
Richard Pieri
richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sun Jun 21 12:42:22 EDT 2009
On Jun 21, 2009, at 2:06 AM, Tom Metro wrote:
> So if you've achieved adequate hardware support with Linux, and you
> don't need any proprietary applications that only run on OS X, and
> don't have a personal preference for the look or UI behavior, then
> I'm not hearing any clear compelling reasons that would suggest OS X
> would lead to a more efficient and productive working environment.
Then I suppose I really didn't try hard enough. :)
As I said, there really isn't any one big thing that makes OS X better
than Linux. It's that I don't have to deal with any of the plethora
of little things that I did (and do) with Linux. I don't have to
worry about hardware support. I don't have to worry about tools that
are incomplete, inconsistent, and sometimes just barely adequate. I
don't have to worry about GNU changing libc and breaking every legacy
program I have and use. I don't have to worry about my distribution
of choice switching from ALSA to PulseAudio and breaking sound. I
don't have to be a sysadmin when I go home. I can if I want but it
isn't necessary like it is with Linux.
I haven't had a Mac as my work machine in several years but when I did
it was the same: I didn't have to be a sysadmin at my desk. That made
being a sysadmin for real production just a little bit easier.
--Rich P.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list