Citrix Xen vs VMWare ESXi
Tim Callaghan
tmcallaghan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Mon Feb 1 12:45:52 EST 2010
I did some recent benchmarking using Citrix Xen and VMWare ESXi on a 2
socket quad core (Xeon 5500) server. I had better performance of my
application on the Xen box. Note, my application is CPU/Memory only
plus networking, no disk I/O.
It was also nice that Xen allows access to all 8 physical CPUs for
free, if you want to present more than 4 CPUs to your VM in ESXi you
have to pay.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Dave Peters <gameslover987-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I have used VMWare ESXi and install few servers for developemnt, but never try Citrix Xen.
> I don't know how stable it is on Citrix Xen. Can anyone tell me the different between Citrix Xen and VMware ESXi?
>
> Thanks.
> DP
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list