End of Moore's law?
Jerry Natowitz
j.natowitz-KealBaEQdz4 at public.gmane.org
Sun Jul 11 13:41:37 EDT 2010
This brings up a somewhat new point. Looking at data comm
infrastructure, what has been the relationship between Moore's Law and
speed and capacity of switching fabric? When I was involved in that
segment, about 10 years ago, fat pipe switches/routers were built with
state of the art technology custom ASICS. When manufacturing processes
shrunk, the ASICS were often die shrunk, with varying results. Have
they been able to re-work ASICS for higher speeds, or is bleeding edge
networking still reinventing the wheel every time wire speeds increase?
Jerry Natowitz
j.natowitz (at) rcn.com
Rich Braun wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:24:01PM -0400, Rich Braun wrote:
>>> Once you have enough computer capacity in your house to drive roughly 5
>>> channels of 3-D HDTV to every room in the house, what else will you need?
>> Cheap and plentiful bandwidth.
>
> That's my point. Once you have a gigE *to* your house *from* the web, each
> website has ample capacity to feed all its customers at that bit-rate, and
> you've got the ability to feed it to all your rooms, and it can all be done
> wirelessly to places beyond your house--all of which is possible right now,
> just kind of expensive--then:
>
> Moore's law is at a dead end.
>
> Right now we're just seeing what price the market will bear. Will it be
> $20/month or $400/month? Each geographic region in the world will have
> somewhat different price points but it won't keep getting better/cheaper in
> the geometric way it has in the past.
>
> -rich
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list