Internet service
Robert Krawitz
rlk-FrUbXkNCsVf2fBVCVOL8/A at public.gmane.org
Sun Jun 6 13:42:52 EDT 2010
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 13:08:19 -0400
From: Matthew Gillen <me-5yx05kfkO/aqeI1yJSURBw at public.gmane.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On 06/06/2010 12:54 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote:
> We currently have Speakeasy, which has excellent reliability.
> Unfortunately, 1500/368 isn't exactly cutting edge speed any more, and
> ever since Best Buy bought them they seem much less interested in
> providing home service.
>
> We're not wired for cable, and when we looked into getting service, it
> turned out that it would be rather expensive; they'd have to do a fair
> bit of work since the closest cable run is a few hundred feet away
> across an intersection.
>
> I'd like to run at least an ssh (for remote login) and anon ftp server
> (for occasional low volume use). I certainly want faster speeds,
> particularly uplink (to upload photos, primarily -- uploading 700 MB
> of photos is dreadfully slow and I just upgraded from a 20D to a 7D).
>
> Any suggestions?
FIOS has pretty good uplink speed. Pretty much every provider other than
speakeasy has "no-server" clauses in their TOS, but the two services you
mention are easy to work around by running those services on a non-standard
(high) port (sometimes they'll port scan low-numbered ports looking for
"servers").
We don't have FIOS in our area.
Running ssh on a non-standard port isn't a bad idea even if you are allowed
to run servers.
Have you looked into WiMAX?
I took a look on wimaxmaps.org, and it appears that the closest point
is in Woburn, which is nowhere near us.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list