Ubuntu moving away from X
Richard Pieri
richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Fri Nov 5 13:28:22 EDT 2010
On Nov 5, 2010, at 1:02 PM, markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org wrote:
>
> In the end, the user suffers. Have you used "X" programs on macintosh? Its
> terrible. That's what Shuttleworth is going to bring to ubuntu.
This is not because XQuartz is terrible. This is because the X applications are terrible. I say that as a daily user of exactly this combination. It's how I get my Xterms and my occasional Guild Wars fix, among many other things including remote X clients.
> X works. X can do everything that Shuttleworth wants to do. X has features
> that Mac and Windows can't even touch.
I call FUD. X cannot do everything that Shuttleworth wants to do. Ever try to install X11 on a bleeding-edge video card? Pain. In. The. Ass. Going straight to the standard OpenGL APIs for the display is a huge, huge win.
XQuartz can do everything that X.Org on Linux can do -- or more accurately everything that X.Org on FreeBSD can do. With XQuartz you get everything that X11 offers *and* everything that Mac offers. I see X11 on Wayland as a huge win for everyone.
--Rich P.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list