GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN

[Jerry Feldman]

On 11/10/2010 09:53 AM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> If people are going to do development on laptops and like most people
> the laptops aren't backed up that often; GIT could be a problem.  With
> CVS or SVN, its typical to have every checkin go to a central server
> which you can make redundant/backup as much as required.   A developer
> who gets good with "git rebase" could do a lot of work locally before
> ever modifying anything on a central server.  You'll want to setup
> some kind of workflow to deal with this.
All development will be done on the servers. The git repos will be 
backed up, but I have not yet decided on the best way to do this. All 
the project directories are on the NFS server.

-- 
Jerry Feldman<gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB  CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846