[Discuss] can you copyright an API?
Tom Metro
tmetro-blu at vl.com
Wed Apr 25 21:30:42 EDT 2012
Jerry Feldman wrote:
> But, since Oracle is claiming the API is patented...
I haven't read the groklaw coverage, but I haven't seen that claimed
elsewhere.
Bill Bogstad wrote:
>Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> The main question of interest will be whether or not the API is patentable.
>
> As I understand it, even software patents have to do with actually
> "doing" something. An API doesn't actually do anything, it is the
> underlying implementation that does. If I could claim patent on an
> API, it would seem to me that I could claim your book describing my
> API violated my patent as well.
>
> In any case, I think it is Google's actual Dalvik VM that might be
> subject to Oracle's patents (and part of this lawsuit); but I don't
> think the API is relevant to patents.
This matches my understanding.
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Even if an API is copyrightable, we've already concluded it's easily
> circumventable.
Renaming the functions largely defeats the point to using an existing
API. If you are going to do that, you'd be better off playing it safe
and just do a "clean room" design of your own API.
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Tom Metro wrote:
>> Sun granted a royalty-free license to use the applicable patents to
>> everyone, regardless of whether they are using OpenJDK or not.
>
> Question: Do you think Google is going to be permitted to sell licenses
> of something Sun patented, when Sun conditioned the free use upon the
> GPL and Sun sells it under some other license? No way man.
Right, seems unlikely, but...
> If Sun granted royalty-free license to use and distribute the
> (patented) application under the terms of GPL, then the royalty-free
> (patent) license would be conditioned on the continued compliance to
> GPL by whoever received it.
Sounds logical, but where is the document that stipulates that. (GPLv2
by itself doesn't.)
This is not a case of a license granted to only a few parties,
negotiated behind closed doors. Instead it is a "drive by" license where
any visitor to the OpenJDK site can download the JDK and be governed by
the legal documents provided on that site and bundled with the code.
-Tom
--
Tom Metro
Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA
"Enterprise solutions through open source."
Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
More information about the Discuss
mailing list