[Discuss] rsnapshot vs. rdiff-backup
John Abreau
abreauj at gmail.com
Thu Dec 5 11:00:10 EST 2013
A limitation of btrfs is that the snapshots are internal to the filesystem.
Kind of makes it hard to put the snapshots on a separate machine.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu)
<blu at nedharvey.com>wrote:
> > From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> > bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of Mike Small
> >
> > Does btrfs fit in here somewhere?
>
> Yes. When you create a btrfs or zfs snapshot, and send incremental to the
> destination system, that is perfectly analogous to rsnapshot sending the
> incremental, except that btrfs and zfs will be much more efficient in terms
> of time & space.
>
> Since rsnapshot is linux/unix only (requires hard links on destination) it
> will eventually suffer a large percentage obsolescence by btrfs. But for
> now, btrfs isn't commonly enough deployed, commonly enough supported... So
> rsnapshot still has its place.
>
> rdiff-backup has a niche in cross-platform compatibility. It makes an
> effort to understand and intelligently translate the various implementation
> details between different systems. For example, different supported
> character sets supported by EXT and NTFS, for example, a different concept
> of permission bits and ACL's on different platforms.
>
> That being said, I'm officially the rdiff-backup maintainer, and I'm not
> doing much maintenance. With the introduction of so many new different
> filesystems and different features and concepts on each one, it becomes
> difficult to support interchangeability between all of them. I'm not
> saying it can't be done; I'm only saying it's work intensive.
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
--
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
Email: abreauj at gmail.com / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6
PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23 C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
More information about the Discuss
mailing list