[Discuss] USB thumbdrive, Linux only usage: FAT vs NTFS vs other? TRIM support?
Rich Pieri
richard.pieri at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 10:25:37 EST 2013
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:27:04 -0500
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> wrote:
> USB thumb drives are inherently insecure without encryption. It does
They're also inherently insecure with full disk encryption. Once
mounted, anyone who has access to the system has access to the files on
the device.
> But, with a Linux file system, then the drive is as secure as a local
> drive (Linux permissions).
Which is the same as "not really secure at all". Thus the rhetorical
question about how ext2 with modes 666 and 777 is at all different from
FAT. To wit: it isn't different at all.
--
Rich P.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list