[Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
Dan Ritter
dsr at randomstring.org
Wed May 7 10:44:04 EDT 2014
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 01:56:29PM +0000, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote:
> Seriously dude?
>
> In software (btrfs and zfs) you should periodically scrub. In fact, this is something that would be good on *all* raid sets, it's just not available on hardware raid. What a scrub does is this: It reads all redundant copies, of all data, on all devices. Searching for cksum failures anywhere in the storage. Attempts to correct them as described above.
Seriously dude?
3Ware tw_cli man page:
Verify activity attempts to verify all units based on their unit
type. Verifying RAID-1 involves checking that both drives contain the
exact data. On RAID-5, the parity information is used to verify data
integrity. RAID-10 and 50 are composite types and follow their respective
array types. On the 9000 series, non-redundant units such as RAID-0,
JBOD, single, and spare, are also verified (by reading and reporting
un-readable sectors).
LSI megacli:
Patrol read
Patrol read is a feature which tries to discover disk error
before it is too late and data is lost. By default it is done
automatically (with a delay of 168 hours between different
patrol reads) and will take up to 30% of IO resources.
To see information about the patrol read state and the delay
between patrol read runs:
...
So, yes, many HW RAID controllers can do this at a block level.
I find your exasperated tone exasperating, by the way.
-dsr-
More information about the Discuss
mailing list