[Discuss] Finance software for Linux
Jack Coats
jack at coats.org
Wed Jan 14 10:16:35 EST 2015
I designed and wrote a corporate tax package for a Fortune 100 company in
the late '70s. I worked very closely with a brilliant CPA. Together we
designed and validated it on 9 months before relational databases were
popular. It is one of the 2 or 3 big projects in, my career. It used IBM
mainframe for data collection and a Univac that had an early spreadsheet
system [Foresight] that allowed a team of tax CPAs to do the forms the IRS
required back when. The CPAs could maintain and run it without computer
folks intervention. I got Lots of flack from IT peers but it worked for a
long time.
It was the 2nd computer tax submission to the IRS. Still had to send 5
copies of paper submission but sent a reel of tape too.
Doing a tax system can be done, but it must be maintainable by tax geeks,
not just computer geeks.
Doing this system got me to understand US taxes. Convoluted.. Yes.
Logical.. Yes[once you dig in deep enough]. Every tax simplification act
has only added complexity. To truly simplify we must toss out all old
rules and start the system over, not just patch on fixes.
<>< Jack
On Jan 14, 2015 8:25 AM, "Bill Bogstad" <bogstad at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Matthew Gillen <me at mattgillen.net> wrote:
> > On 1/14/2015 8:05 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> >> Unfortunately there are only a few companies in the industry who
> >> produce tax software, and they only Windows and Mac compatible, or
> >> you can use the web interfaces. This type of software does not really
> >> lend itself to to Open Source.
> >
> > Why do you say that? Because it requires a lot of specialized knowledge
> > that typical CS majors don't have? There are certain projects in the
> > open source world that have to pay attention to regulatory issues (e.g.
> > wireless drivers), and they seem to be able to do so.
> >
> > I suppose the tax code is orders of magnitude more complex and
> > intertwined. I'd be curious to explore your statement a little more
> > though regarding what kinds of things lend themselves to open source.
>
> It isn't just the complexity. It is the constant churn. Sometimes
> because of last minute
> changes from Congress, the IRS doesn't put out final
> instructions/forms until late Fall.
> Admittedly these are usually fairly esoteric issues, but as lots of
> people have something odd about their taxes (uninsured medical
> expenses, loss due to theft/fire, consulting income, etc., etc.); any
> organization putting out tax software has to be prepared to put
> out a new version fairly quickly. Plus the software is
> geographically restricted. US Federal tax software might be
> adaptable to state level returns; but probably won't be at
> all useful for UK or Canadian taxes. This just doesn't strike me as
> a problem domain that
> is very tractable to volunteer efforts. It is also (to a great
> extent) an all or nothing problem for most users. If tax software
> only handles 2 of the 3 forms that I need to fill out, it probably
> isn't worth my time to use it. I'm not aware of any other free
> software (or culture i.e. wikipedia) which operates under these
> conditions.
>
> Bill Bogstad
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list