[Discuss] Permission denied
Rich Pieri
richard.pieri at gmail.com
Mon Apr 25 15:16:34 EDT 2016
On 4/25/2016 12:26 PM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
> Thanks for the tip, Rich. We'll give that a try.
You're welcome.
FWIW, security on NT is like a network firewall where a specific host
(Administrator) is granted explicit access to every service and object
behind the wall. If you remove the rule that allows admin users' access
to a service then that service is inaccessible to admin users. The rule
must be restored before Administrator can access and manipulate the service.
It's a very different model from anything POSIX-like.
> Would that be "sudo chattr +i"?
Why, yes, it would. It drove me nuts the first time I encountered it.
--
Rich P.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list