[Discuss] du question
dan moylan
jdm at moylan.us
Thu Jun 8 14:11:22 EDT 2017
dan ritter writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:48:52AM -0400, dan moylan wrote:
> > > looking at the sizes of the directories created by
> > > backintime i am puzzled by a directory which shows up as
> > > 86M in one instance and 35G in another. can someone
> > > please explain what's going on.
> > > moylan 1[1630] ls
> > > 20170607-120002-419/ 20170607-230005-357/ b1* last_snapshot@
> > > moylan 1[1631] du -s *
> > > 35G 20170607-120002-419
> > > 86M 20170607-230005-357
> > > 4.0K b1
> > > 0 last_snapshot
> > > moylan 1[1632] du -s 20170607-230005-357/
> > > 35G 20170607-230005-357/
> > > moylan 1[1633] du -s ../
> > > 35G ../
> > I don't know backintime, but I'm guessing it uses links to
> > do file-level snapshots. Bet there's a FAQ.
> yes, true enough, and i understand that. it's the performance
> of du that i don't understand -- look at the two cases:
> this shows the actual storage, 86M assigned to
> 20170607-230005-357.
> > moylan 1[1631] du -s *
> > 35G 20170607-120002-419
> > 86M 20170607-230005-357
> > 4.0K b1
> > 0 last_snapshot
> this shows the primary backup storage also assigned to
> 20170607-230005-357.
> > moylan 1[1632] du -s 20170607-230005-357/
> > 35G 20170607-230005-357/
> > now why is that?
> Because hardlinks. Explained in a FAQ. I googled "backintime
> faq" and got a faq which said to try this:
> du -hd1 /media/<USER>/backintime/<HOST>/<USER>/1/
i have known from the beginning that the problem had
something to do with hard links. i tried your suggested
command but it showed the same.
moylan 1[1658] ls
20170607-120002-419/ 20170607-230005-357/ 20170608-120007-246/ b1*
last_snapshot@
moylan 1[1659] du -s *
35G 20170607-120002-419
86M 20170607-230005-357
80M 20170608-120007-246
4.0K b1
0 last_snapshot
moylan 1[1660] du -hd1 20170607-230005-357/
35G 20170607-230005-357/backup
35G 20170607-230005-357/
moylan 1[1661] du -s 20170607-230005-357/
35G 20170607-230005-357/
let it be acknowledged that i am naieve, but i expect either
of the last two commands to show 86M, and neither does,
whilst du -s * does. still puzzled.
ole dan
j. daniel moylan
84 harvard ave
brookline, ma 02446-6202
617-777-0207 (cel)
jdm at moylan.us
www.moylan.us
[no html pls]
More information about the Discuss
mailing list