[Discuss] Fidelity voice-recognition security?
Richard Pieri
richard.pieri at gmail.com
Thu Nov 23 12:24:12 EST 2017
On 11/23/2017 12:06 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote:
> Which is irrelevant, since this is about voice recognition, not
> fingerprints.
It is relevant because the genetic and environmental factors that make
fingerprints unique also have direct effects on voices.
> The same applies to microphones. They aren't perfect and they vary
> too. And there are a lot more variables with voices/microphones and
> fingerprints: position of the mic wrt the mouth, ambient noise,
> airflow, upper respiratory infections, allergies, exertion, and so
> forth.
No argument. I didn't say it was easy.
> ...except that the synthesized voice can incorporate said analog
> distortion. Decades ago Carver managed to do a pretty good job of
> reproducing a much more expensive Mark Levinson amplifier, using
> purely analog components; that kind of thing can be done a lot more
> easily now.
Again, no argument. Again, I didn't say it was easy.
--
Rich P.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list